Errors in your scholarly record accumulate quietly — a split profile here, a wrong affiliation there — and each one costs you attribution.
Almost all of them are correctable, and an annual check catches them while they are still small.
What to check annually
- Search for yourself in the major sources for your field.
- Look for duplicate profiles — common and correctable.
- Look for works wrongly attributed to you — these matter more than missing ones.
- Check affiliation history, including past affiliations.
- Check your name appears in the form you use.
- An hour a year prevents most accumulated problems.
Common errors
- Split profiles from name variants.
- Merged profiles combining you with a namesake — the more damaging kind.
- Past affiliation overwritten by current.
- Missing publications, especially in less-indexed venues.
- Outdated contact details.
How to correct them
- Most systems have a correction route — find it and use it.
- Start with your persistent identifier record, which many others draw from.
- Report to the source, not only to the aggregator downstream.
- Keep a note of what you reported and when.
- Follow up if nothing changes.
Preventing them
- Use your persistent identifier on every submission.
- Use one consistent name form.
- Use the official institutional affiliation form.
- Add affiliations with dates rather than replacing.
- Update your identifier record when you move.
When you move institutions
- Add the new affiliation with a start date; do not overwrite the old one.
- Update your identifier record first.
- Use a durable contact address, not an institutional one you will lose.
- Watch for split profiles appearing over the following months.
- Overwriting is the most common and most damaging move-related error.
Adding what is missing
- Add outputs from less-indexed venues yourself — nobody else will.
- Add datasets and software with their identifiers.
- Add work in the local language.
- These are systematically missing from automated sources.
One thing worth remembering
Check for works wrongly attributed to you as well as missing ones.
A missing publication understates your record. A wrongly attributed one associates you with work you did not do — and that is a harder problem to notice and a worse one to leave.
Câu hỏi thường gặp
What should be checked annually?
Search for yourself in major sources, look for duplicate profiles, look for works wrongly attributed to you, check affiliation history including past affiliations, and check your name form.
What are the common errors?
Split profiles from name variants, merged profiles combining you with a namesake, past affiliations overwritten by current, missing publications from less-indexed venues, and outdated contact details.
How are errors corrected?
Use the correction route most systems have, start with your persistent identifier record which others draw from, report to the source rather than only downstream, and keep notes.
What should happen when you move institutions?
Add the new affiliation with a start date without overwriting the old one, update your identifier record first, and use a durable contact address.
Which error matters more than missing publications?
Works wrongly attributed to you — they associate you with work you did not do, which is harder to notice and worse to leave.